Athlon X4 950vsEPYC 9755
The Athlon X4 950 is a basic quad-core chip for budget office builds, while the EPYC 9755 is a 128-core server monster for massive data centers.
Athlon X4 950
Bristol Ridge · 28 nm · 2017
As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases.
EPYC 9755
Turin · 4 nm · 2024
As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases.
Overall Performance Score
A unified score from combined synthetic and real-world benchmarks. 100 represents the fastest desktop CPU available.
Side-by-Side Specs
Every detail compared. Highlighted cells indicate the leading value for that metric.
Which should you buy?
The EPYC 9755 wins overwhelmingly for heavy server work, while the Athlon X4 950 is only suitable for basic office tasks.
For budget buyers, the Athlon X4 950 is the smarter pick if you need a cheap, low-power CPU for light computing.
Choose the Athlon X4 950 when building an ultra-low-cost home office PC that never runs demanding software.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Athlon X4 950 better than the EPYC 9755?
Overall the EPYC 9755 is the stronger processor: it ranks higher in our aggregate performance score (100 vs 2 out of 100), so it leads the Athlon X4 950 in most workloads.
How much faster is the EPYC 9755 than the Athlon X4 950?
Based on our aggregated benchmark scores the EPYC 9755 is roughly 4900% faster than the Athlon X4 950 overall. The real-world gap varies by game, resolution and settings.
Which should you buy, the Athlon X4 950 or the EPYC 9755?
If you want the most performance, pick the EPYC 9755. If the Athlon X4 950 is meaningfully cheaper where you shop, it can be the better value for similar real-world results — check current prices and the full spec comparison above before deciding.