Celeron G3900EvsEPYC 9755
The Celeron G3900E is a low-power, dual-core chip for basic office or embedded tasks, while the EPYC 9755 is a 128-core server monster built for heavy data-crunching and virtualization.
Celeron G3900E
Skylake · 14 nm · 2016
As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases.
EPYC 9755
Turin · 4 nm · 2024
As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases.
Overall Performance Score
A unified score from combined synthetic and real-world benchmarks. 100 represents the fastest desktop CPU available.
Side-by-Side Specs
Every detail compared. Highlighted cells indicate the leading value for that metric.
Which should you buy?
The EPYC 9755 dominates overall for heavy computing tasks, leaving the Celeron G3900E far behind.
For budget buyers, the Celeron G3900E is the smarter pick—it costs far less and uses much less power.
The Celeron G3900E is right for a low-power, basic office PC where only simple tasks are needed.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Celeron G3900E better than the EPYC 9755?
Overall the EPYC 9755 is the stronger processor: it ranks higher in our aggregate performance score (100 vs 1 out of 100), so it leads the Celeron G3900E in most workloads.
How much faster is the EPYC 9755 than the Celeron G3900E?
Based on our aggregated benchmark scores the EPYC 9755 is roughly 9900% faster than the Celeron G3900E overall. The real-world gap varies by game, resolution and settings.
Which should you buy, the Celeron G3900E or the EPYC 9755?
If you want the most performance, pick the EPYC 9755. If the Celeron G3900E is meaningfully cheaper where you shop, it can be the better value for similar real-world results — check current prices and the full spec comparison above before deciding.