Celeron G3930TvsEPYC 9755
The Celeron G3930T is a low-power dual-core chip for basic office work or a home server, while the EPYC 9755 is a 128-core server monster built for heavy data crunching and virtualization.
Celeron G3930T
Kaby Lake · 14 nm · 2017
As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases.
EPYC 9755
Turin · 4 nm · 2024
As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases.
Overall Performance Score
A unified score from combined synthetic and real-world benchmarks. 100 represents the fastest desktop CPU available.
Side-by-Side Specs
Every detail compared. Highlighted cells indicate the leading value for that metric.
Which should you buy?
The EPYC 9755 utterly dominates the Celeron G3930T in every performance metric, making it the clear winner for any demanding workload.
For budget buyers, the Celeron G3930T is the smarter pick due to its low cost and minimal power use for basic tasks.
The Celeron G3930T is the right choice for a low-power, single-purpose media server where the EPYC 9755's massive performance and power draw are wasteful.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Celeron G3930T better than the EPYC 9755?
Overall the EPYC 9755 is the stronger processor: it ranks higher in our aggregate performance score (100 vs 1 out of 100), so it leads the Celeron G3930T in most workloads.
How much faster is the EPYC 9755 than the Celeron G3930T?
Based on our aggregated benchmark scores the EPYC 9755 is roughly 9900% faster than the Celeron G3930T overall. The real-world gap varies by game, resolution and settings.
Which should you buy, the Celeron G3930T or the EPYC 9755?
If you want the most performance, pick the EPYC 9755. If the Celeron G3930T is meaningfully cheaper where you shop, it can be the better value for similar real-world results — check current prices and the full spec comparison above before deciding.