Celeron G4900vsEPYC 9755
The Celeron G4900 is a low-cost, dual-core chip for basic office or home tasks, while the EPYC 9755 is a 128-core server monster built for heavy data centers and scientific workloads.
Celeron G4900
Coffee Lake · 14 nm · 2018
As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases.
EPYC 9755
Turin · 4 nm · 2024
As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases.
Overall Performance Score
A unified score from combined synthetic and real-world benchmarks. 100 represents the fastest desktop CPU available.
Side-by-Side Specs
Every detail compared. Highlighted cells indicate the leading value for that metric.
Which should you buy?
The EPYC 9755 is the overall winner by a massive margin, offering vastly more cores and performance for demanding server workloads.
For budget-focused buyers, the Celeron G4900 is the smarter pick due to its much lower power consumption and cost for basic tasks.
The Celeron G4900 is the right choice for a low-cost home office PC where a high-core-count server chip is overkill.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Celeron G4900 better than the EPYC 9755?
Overall the EPYC 9755 is the stronger processor: it ranks higher in our aggregate performance score (100 vs 1 out of 100), so it leads the Celeron G4900 in most workloads.
How much faster is the EPYC 9755 than the Celeron G4900?
Based on our aggregated benchmark scores the EPYC 9755 is roughly 9900% faster than the Celeron G4900 overall. The real-world gap varies by game, resolution and settings.
Which should you buy, the Celeron G4900 or the EPYC 9755?
If you want the most performance, pick the EPYC 9755. If the Celeron G4900 is meaningfully cheaper where you shop, it can be the better value for similar real-world results — check current prices and the full spec comparison above before deciding.