Celeron G6900vsEPYC 9755
The Intel Celeron G6900 is a basic two-core desktop chip for simple office tasks and light computing, while the AMD EPYC 9755 is a massive 128-core server processor built for heavy data centers and virtualization.
Celeron G6900
Alder Lake-S · Intel 7 nm · 2022
As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases.
EPYC 9755
Turin · 4 nm · 2024
As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases.
Overall Performance Score
A unified score from combined synthetic and real-world benchmarks. 100 represents the fastest desktop CPU available.
Side-by-Side Specs
Every detail compared. Highlighted cells indicate the leading value for that metric.
Which should you buy?
The EPYC 9755 wins overall for anyone needing massive multi-threaded performance, while the Celeron G6900 is only a choice for ultra-low-cost, low-power systems.
The Celeron G6900 is the smarter budget pick for basic office or home tasks, whereas the EPYC 9755 is overkill and overpriced for such use.
For a simple home server running a single lightweight application, the Celeron G6900 is the right choice despite its far weaker performance.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Celeron G6900 better than the EPYC 9755?
Overall the EPYC 9755 is the stronger processor: it ranks higher in our aggregate performance score (100 vs 3 out of 100), so it leads the Celeron G6900 in most workloads.
How much faster is the EPYC 9755 than the Celeron G6900?
Based on our aggregated benchmark scores the EPYC 9755 is roughly 3233% faster than the Celeron G6900 overall. The real-world gap varies by game, resolution and settings.
Which should you buy, the Celeron G6900 or the EPYC 9755?
If you want the most performance, pick the EPYC 9755. If the Celeron G6900 is meaningfully cheaper where you shop, it can be the better value for similar real-world results — check current prices and the full spec comparison above before deciding.