Celeron G6900EvsEPYC 9755
The Celeron G6900E is a basic two-core chip for low-cost office or embedded systems, while the EPYC 9755 is a 128-core server processor built for heavy data-center workloads.
Celeron G6900E
Alder Lake-S · 10 nm · 2022
As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases.
EPYC 9755
Turin · 4 nm · 2024
As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases.
Overall Performance Score
A unified score from combined synthetic and real-world benchmarks. 100 represents the fastest desktop CPU available.
Side-by-Side Specs
Every detail compared. Highlighted cells indicate the leading value for that metric.
Which should you buy?
The EPYC 9755 wins overall for anyone needing raw throughput, while the Celeron G6900E is only for the most basic tasks.
For budget builds, the Celeron G6900E is the smarter pick, as it costs far less for light office work.
The Celeron G6900E is the right choice in a low-power home server that just runs a single lightweight application.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Celeron G6900E better than the EPYC 9755?
Overall the EPYC 9755 is the stronger processor: it ranks higher in our aggregate performance score (100 vs 3 out of 100), so it leads the Celeron G6900E in most workloads.
How much faster is the EPYC 9755 than the Celeron G6900E?
Based on our aggregated benchmark scores the EPYC 9755 is roughly 3233% faster than the Celeron G6900E overall. The real-world gap varies by game, resolution and settings.
Which should you buy, the Celeron G6900E or the EPYC 9755?
If you want the most performance, pick the EPYC 9755. If the Celeron G6900E is meaningfully cheaper where you shop, it can be the better value for similar real-world results — check current prices and the full spec comparison above before deciding.