Celeron J3160vsEPYC 9755
The Celeron J3160 is a tiny, ultra-low-power chip for basic home servers or thin clients, while the EPYC 9755 is a massive server processor for crushing heavy data-center workloads.
Celeron J3160
Airmont · 14 nm · 2016
As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases.
EPYC 9755
Turin · 4 nm · 2024
As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases.
Overall Performance Score
A unified score from combined synthetic and real-world benchmarks. 100 represents the fastest desktop CPU available.
Side-by-Side Specs
Every detail compared. Highlighted cells indicate the leading value for that metric.
Which should you buy?
The EPYC 9755 is overwhelmingly faster for demanding tasks, making it the clear winner overall for anyone needing serious compute power.
For budget buyers, the Celeron J3160 is the smarter pick due to its much lower power draw and cost.
The Celeron J3160 is the right choice for a low-power home server or basic office PC where performance demands are minimal.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Celeron J3160 better than the EPYC 9755?
Overall the EPYC 9755 is the stronger processor: it ranks higher in our aggregate performance score (100 vs 1 out of 100), so it leads the Celeron J3160 in most workloads.
How much faster is the EPYC 9755 than the Celeron J3160?
Based on our aggregated benchmark scores the EPYC 9755 is roughly 9900% faster than the Celeron J3160 overall. The real-world gap varies by game, resolution and settings.
Which should you buy, the Celeron J3160 or the EPYC 9755?
If you want the most performance, pick the EPYC 9755. If the Celeron J3160 is meaningfully cheaper where you shop, it can be the better value for similar real-world results — check current prices and the full spec comparison above before deciding.