Celeron J4025vsEPYC 9755
The Celeron J4025 is a low-power, dual-core chip for basic home or office tasks like web browsing and light document work, while the EPYC 9755 is a massive 128-core server processor built for heavy data centers and enterprise workloads.
Celeron J4025
Gemini Lake Refresh · 14 nm · 2019
As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases.
EPYC 9755
Turin · 4 nm · 2024
As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases.
Overall Performance Score
A unified score from combined synthetic and real-world benchmarks. 100 represents the fastest desktop CPU available.
Side-by-Side Specs
Every detail compared. Highlighted cells indicate the leading value for that metric.
Which should you buy?
The EPYC 9755 is the clear winner overall, offering vastly superior performance for demanding server workloads.
For budget buyers, the Celeron J4025 is the smarter pick due to its extremely low power draw and cost.
The Celeron J4025 is the right choice for a low-power, basic home server or embedded system where the EPYC's massive power and cost would be wasteful.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Celeron J4025 better than the EPYC 9755?
Overall the EPYC 9755 is the stronger processor: it ranks higher in our aggregate performance score (100 vs 1 out of 100), so it leads the Celeron J4025 in most workloads.
How much faster is the EPYC 9755 than the Celeron J4025?
Based on our aggregated benchmark scores the EPYC 9755 is roughly 9900% faster than the Celeron J4025 overall. The real-world gap varies by game, resolution and settings.
Which should you buy, the Celeron J4025 or the EPYC 9755?
If you want the most performance, pick the EPYC 9755. If the Celeron J4025 is meaningfully cheaper where you shop, it can be the better value for similar real-world results — check current prices and the full spec comparison above before deciding.