Core 7 160ULvsEPYC 9755
The Core 7 160UL is a low-power, 10-core chip for compact desktops and embedded systems, while the EPYC 9755 is a 128-core server monster built for massive data center workloads.
Core 7 160UL
Raptor Lake-PS · 10 nm · 2024
As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases.
EPYC 9755
Turin · 4 nm · 2024
As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases.
Overall Performance Score
A unified score from combined synthetic and real-world benchmarks. 100 represents the fastest desktop CPU available.
Side-by-Side Specs
Every detail compared. Highlighted cells indicate the leading value for that metric.
Which should you buy?
The EPYC 9755 wins outright for raw compute, leaving the Core 7 160UL far behind in multi-threaded work.
For budget buyers, the Core 7 160UL is the smarter pick due to its very low power draw and modest performance.
Choose the Core 7 160UL for a low-power office PC where extreme performance isn't needed.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Core 7 160UL better than the EPYC 9755?
Overall the EPYC 9755 is the stronger processor: it ranks higher in our aggregate performance score (100 vs 7 out of 100), so it leads the Core 7 160UL in most workloads.
How much faster is the EPYC 9755 than the Core 7 160UL?
Based on our aggregated benchmark scores the EPYC 9755 is roughly 1329% faster than the Core 7 160UL overall. The real-world gap varies by game, resolution and settings.
Which should you buy, the Core 7 160UL or the EPYC 9755?
If you want the most performance, pick the EPYC 9755. If the Core 7 160UL is meaningfully cheaper where you shop, it can be the better value for similar real-world results — check current prices and the full spec comparison above before deciding.