2score
#526 of 555
Overall rank

Celeron J4105

4 cores · 4 threads · up to 2.5 GHz on FCBGA1090.

3.4 · 48 votes

As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases.

Cores
4
Threads
4
Boost
2.5 GHz
L3 cache
4 MB
TDP
10W
Socket
FCBGA1090

Performance breakdown

Gaming2
Productivity2
Single-core2
Multi-core17
Power efficiency2

Lab scores

Performance score2
Cores4
Threads4
Boost clock (GHz)2.5 GHz

Estimated gaming FPS

Paired with a high-end GPU. CPU impact is largest at 1080p.

1080p4 fps
1440p4 fps
4K2 fps

Full specifications

Processor & cores
Architecture
Goldmont Plus
Process node
14 nm
Socket
FCBGA1090
Release year
2017
Total cores
4
Threads
4
Integrated graphics
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Clocks & cache
Base clock
1.5 GHz
Boost clock
2.5 GHz
Multiplier
15
L1 cache
256 KB
L2 cache
4 MB
L3 cache
4 MB
Memory & platform
Memory support
DDR4
Max capacity
8 GB
Channels
2
Max bandwidth
38.397 GB/s
Base power (TDP)
10W
Max temperature
105°C
PCIe
PCIe 2.0
Launch price
$107
Technologies
Instruction sets
SSE4.2
Extensions
AES-NI, VT-x, VT-d
Community Feedback

What Owners Say

Owners like its crazy low power draw and silent fanless builds. The usual gripe is it chokes hard on anything beyond basic web browsing or light office tasks.

Pros
  • Sips power, barely needs cooling
  • Handles basic office tasks fine
  • Stays cool in tiny cases
  • Silent operation without a fan
Cons
  • Feels slow in heavy tasks
  • Integrated GPU is very weak
  • No upgrade path possible
Verdict

Our verdict on the Celeron J4105

A budget-friendly, low-power Apollo Lake chip for basic office tasks, but its biggest flaw is weak graphics performance.

Get it if you need a tiny, fanless media server or basic office PC that sips power and stays silent. Skip it if you want to run modern apps or multitask, as its slow cores will frustrate you.

Buy it if…

  • You need a basic office PC for spreadsheets and browsing.
  • You want a low-power always-on home server or NAS.
  • You're building a cheap media center for streaming video.
3.4

48 votes

Rate this CPU

Add your verdict