30score
#89 of 131
Overall rank
NVIDIAEntry

Arc A750

4 · 116 votes
Best for 1080p esports gaming

As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases.

VRAM
8 GB
CUDA
3,584
FP32
17.2 TF
Bandwidth
512 GB/s
TDP
225W
Boost
2400 MHz
Strengths at a Glance

How it stacks up to the flagship

Each metric is shown as a percentage of the GeForce RTX 5090 D, the strongest card we track.

FP32 compute17.2 TFLOPS16%
vs RTX 5090 D: 104.8 TFLOPS
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s29%
vs RTX 5090 D: 1790 GB/s
VRAM capacity8 GB25%
vs RTX 5090 D: 32 GB
Shading units3,58416%
vs RTX 5090 D: 21,760
Power efficiency24/10041%
vs RTX 5090 D: 58/100
Synthetic Benchmarks

Estimated benchmark results

Each result is shown as a share of the RTX 5090 D's score in the same test.

3DMark Time Spy10,800pts
vs RTX 5090 D: 36,000 pts
3DMark Port Royal (RT)5,580pts
vs RTX 5090 D: 18,000 pts
Blender (samples/min)1,560spm
vs RTX 5090 D: 5,200 spm
Geekbench Compute74,400pts
vs RTX 5090 D: 240,000 pts

Performance breakdown

Gaming30
Ray tracing31
AI / Compute31
Creator / 3D30
Power efficiency24
Real-World Gaming

FPS Across Resolutions

1080p · Ultra preset1440p · Ultra preset4K · Ultra preset
Cyberpunk 2077avg 39 fps
1080p
53
1440p
41
4K
22
Counter-Strike 2avg 86 fps
1080p
140
1440p
86
4K
32
Fortniteavg 85 fps
1080p
141
1440p
76
4K
37
Battlefield 5avg 80 fps
1080p
112
1440p
81
4K
47
Far Cry 5avg 71 fps
1080p
95
1440p
74
4K
44
Valorantavg 199 fps
1080p
189
1440p
228
4K
179

Average FPS across all PC games

1080p
114fps
1440p
64fps
4K
38fps

Cost per frame

Launch MSRP ($289) ÷ average FPS — lower is better.

1080p
$2.56
1440p
$4.49
4K
$7.50
Community Feedback

What Owners Say

Owners love the price-to-performance ratio for 1440p gaming, especially with newer games. The usual gripe is the older driver issues and higher power draw under load.

Pros
  • Great price, plays modern games well.
  • Runs cool and quiet under load.
  • Solid ray tracing for the money.
  • Good performance in newer titles.
Cons
  • Driver stability still needs work
  • Older games can be problematic
  • Idle power consumption is too high

Supported technologies

Ray TracingDLSSNVENCAV1 Encode

Full specifications

Graphics processor
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Process node
6 nm
Transistors
21.7 B
SM Count
28
Release date
2022
Launch price
$289
Core configuration
CUDA Cores
3,584
RT Cores
28
Tensor Cores
448
TMUs
224
ROPs
112
L2 cache
16 MB
Memory
Size
8 GB
Type
GDDR6
Bus width
256-bit
Bandwidth
512 GB/s
Memory clock
2000 MHz
Clocks & throughput
Base clock
2050 MHz
Boost clock
2400 MHz
FP32 (float)
17.2 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
17.2 TFLOPS
Pixel rate
269 GPixel/s
Texture rate
537.6 GTexel/s
Board & power
TDP
225W
Suggested PSU
450W
Power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Bus interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Slot width
2-slot
Display & outputs
Max resolution
7680×4320
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0

API and SDK support

DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model
6.6
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
3.0
Vulkan
1.3
Verdict

Our verdict on the Arc A750

The Intel Arc A750 is a first-gen effort that punches above its price bracket but stumbles with older DirectX 9 and 10 games.

Get it if you want a solid 1440p card on a budget and don’t mind tinkering with drivers for older games. Skip it if you play a lot of DirectX 9 titles or want guaranteed smooth performance out of the box.

Buy it if…

  • Buy it if you want great value for 1440p gaming without ray tracing.
  • Buy it if you're building a new PC and don't mind older game driver tweaks.
  • Buy it if you need a fast, cheap GPU for video encoding and creation work.
4.0

116 votes

Rate this GPU

Add your verdict